When shopping for pantry staples, you’ve likely faced the choice between food packaged in metal cans and Tetra Pak-style cartons. With many supermarkets swapping canned products for cartons that appear more eco-friendly, it’s time to dive into the science behind both packaging options. Which one is actually better for the planet and your health? Let’s explore.
Aluminium Cans: A Closer Look
Environmental Impact of Aluminium Cans
- High Energy Use in Production: Aluminium is made from bauxite ore, a process that involves energy-intensive electrolysis and heavy fossil fuel use. This releases significant CO₂ emissions.
- Mining and Land Degradation: Bauxite mining causes deforestation, biodiversity loss and generates toxic red mud waste.
- Water Pollution: Aluminium refining creates wastewater contaminated with heavy metals.
- Recycling Challenges: While aluminium is highly recyclable, not all cans are recycled, and some end up in landfills, where they persist for centuries.
Health Concerns Related to Aluminium Cans
- BPA and Plastic Linings: To prevent food from contacting metal, cans are lined with plastic, often containing BPA—a chemical linked to hormonal disruption and reproductive issues.
- Heavy Metal Leaching: Trace amounts of aluminium can leach into acidic foods. Although studies are inconclusive, repeated findings of chemical contamination are concerning.
Recyclability and Circular Economy
- Aluminium is infinitely recyclable. Approximately 76% of aluminium is recycled globally, and 75% of all aluminium ever produced is still in use (World Aluminium).
- Recycling aluminium saves up to 95% of the energy compared to new production.
What Is Tetra Pak?
Tetra Pak is a brand of multilayer cartons typically made of:
- 70% paperboard
- 25% plastic (polyethylene)
- 5% aluminium
Environmental Impact of Tetra Pak
- Complex Recycling: These multi-material cartons require specialized recycling facilities. In many regions, they are not recycled properly and end up in landfills or incinerators.
- Lower Transport Emissions: Tetra Pak is lightweight and compact, making it more efficient to transport than glass or metal packaging.
- Downcycling Limitations: While paper fibers can be reused, the plastic and aluminium layers are often discarded.
Health Concerns Related to Tetra Pak
- Polyethylene Layers: These can degrade and leach chemicals into food, especially under heat.
- Microplastics: Over time, degraded plastic layers can release microplastics into packaged products.
Tetra Pak vs. Metal Cans: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Findings
A 2022 LCA study by the Norwegian Institute for Sustainability Research found:
- Lower Emissions in Production: Tetra Pak had lower emissions than metal.
- Higher Circularity for Metal: Metal cans scored nearly twice as high in recyclability and reusability.
According to World Aluminium and DTU studies:
- Increasing recycled content in aluminium cans offers greater environmental benefits than switching to renewable energy.
- Circular systems beat single-use systems in long-term sustainability.
Current Global Recycling Rates:
- Aluminium: 76%
- Tetra Pak: 25% (global), 50% (Europe), 16% (USA), 1% (Vietnam)
The Greenwashing Problem with Tetra Pak
- Some claims like “100% recyclable” ignore real-world recycling infrastructure limitations.
- “Bio-based” plastic options sound appealing but often increase emissions in other categories (e.g., agriculture).
Comparing the Two
| Criteria | Tetra Pak | Metal Cans |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Footprint | Lower (production, transport) | Higher (especially virgin aluminium) |
| Recyclability | Limited by infrastructure | Widely recyclable, infinitely reusable |
| Health Risk | Plastic leaching, microplastics | BPA, aluminium leaching |
| Circular Economy Potential | Low | High |
| Transport Efficiency | High | Moderate |
Sustainable Tips for Using Metal Cans
- Choose cans made from recycled aluminium or steel.
- Always rinse cans before recycling.
- Avoid crushing cans unless your local recycler requires it.
- Opt for BPA-free and safer lining materials (like polyester or acrylic).
- Store cans in cool, dry spaces.
- Avoid using dented or bulging cans.
- Transfer food to containers after opening.
- Repurpose cans for DIY or storage.
- Never toss metal in the trash—it’s a valuable resource.
Final Takeaway
- Best for Circularity: Metal Cans
- Best for Carbon Emissions & Transport: Tetra Pak
If Tetra Pak recycling is accessible in your area and you’re concerned about BPA or metal contamination, Tetra Pak may be the better choice. However, in terms of long-term reuse and recycling, metal cans remain a powerful player in the circular economy.
Still, neither material is perfect. The real solution? Transitioning to reusable packaging systems and closed-loop supply chains. Until then, informed choices and local recycling infrastructure will be your best tools for more sustainable consumption.
Want more science-backed breakdowns like this? Subscribe for more eco-deep dives and sustainability tips!
